Disability law in the United States centers on protecting individuals with physical and mental impairments from discrimination, guaranteeing equal access and opportunities in employment, public life, education, and services. At its core stands the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a landmark civil rights law enacted in 1990 that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities and mandates reasonable accommodations in many areas of life. But major legal and policy developments — including recent lawsuits, federal policy changes, and regulatory scrutiny — are shaping how disability rights are enforced today.
The Legal Foundation: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
The ADA remains the principal statute governing disability rights in the U.S. It defines disability broadly and prohibits discrimination in employment (Title I), public services (Title II), and public accommodations and commercial facilities (Title III). The law also requires reasonable accommodations for qualified individuals with disabilities unless doing so creates an undue hardship for the employer or entity.
In practice, this means employers must engage in a “cooperative dialogue” with employees who disclose disabilities to determine appropriate workplace adjustments, and service providers must comply with accessibility requirements.
Recent News: Federal Enforcement and Litigation
In the past few months, disability rights have generated significant legal headlines — showing both enforcement in action and emergent legal challenges.
1. DOJ Sues Uber for Disability Discrimination
One of the most notable developments came in late 2025, when the U.S. Department of Justice filed a federal lawsuit against Uber, alleging that the ride-hailing giant routinely discriminates against passengers with disabilities. According to the DOJ complaint filed in federal court, Uber drivers frequently refuse to provide rides to people with service animals or stowable wheelchairs and impose unlawful fees related to disability accommodations. The lawsuit seeks substantial damages for affected riders and reinforces that ADA protections extend into the tech-enabled transportation space.
This litigation highlights ongoing enforcement of Title III of the ADA — a reminder to platform businesses that compliance is not optional, and systemic discrimination can lead to high-stakes federal litigation.
2. EEOC’s Disability Discrimination Suits
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) remains active in holding employers accountable. For example, in late 2025 the EEOC sued Wendy’s International, LLC, alleging that a long-time district manager was fired in violation of the ADA and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act after returning from disability-related surgery and being denied reasonable accommodation.
In addition, the EEOC regularly pursues cases where employers allegedly fail to engage in accommodations or retaliate against employees who exercise their rights. This enforcement focus underscores the evolving nature of workplace disability discrimination claims.
3. ADA Accommodation Litigation Trends
Beyond headline cases, recent legal analyses show employers increasingly facing ADA lawsuits for failing to accommodate workers with disabilities. Recent stories compiled by HR industry outlets reveal cases where policies like rigid return-to-work rules, failures to assess accommodation requests, or discrimination related to mental health treatment requests have led to litigation or administrative charges.
These examples demonstrate employers must not only know ADA requirements but actively and fairly assess accommodation requests.
Policy Shifts and Disability Rights Advocacy
Legal battles aren’t limited to the courtroom. Policy changes and administrative actions at federal agencies are also reshaping disability rights.
Advocates recently sued the U.S. Department of Education over plans to outsource disability programs — arguing that administrative changes could undermine enforcement of rights in schools and educational programs. While this challenge is ongoing, it reflects broader concerns about federal agency roles in maintaining civil rights protections.
Other commentators and disability advocates are watching proposed shifts in federal policy that could affect Medicaid, health care access, and social supports that individuals with disabilities rely on. These policy debates, covered in recent trend pieces, emphasize the intersection of disability rights with health care, public assistance, and broader civil rights law.
The Legal Landscape: Litigation and Judicial Interpretation
In addition to enforcement actions and policy challenges, courts continue to shape disability law through case decisions:
-
The U.S. Supreme Court is actively interpreting ADA definitions and their boundaries. For example, Stanley v. City of Sanford clarified that retirees may not always be considered “qualified individuals” under ADA employment provisions for post-employment benefit claims.
-
The Bufkin v. Collins decision holds significance for veterans’ disability claims, requiring courts to apply a clear standard when reviewing benefits determinations — a technical but important procedural ruling for disability benefits litigation.
These judicial decisions reflect ongoing refinement of disability law in diverse contexts, from public benefits to employment rights.
Practical Takeaways for Individuals and Advocates
For individuals with disabilities and their advocates, the contemporary legal terrain offers both promise and challenges:
-
Enforcement is active: Federal agencies, including the DOJ and EEOC, continue to file cases enforcing ADA compliance across sectors.
-
Policy landscapes matter: Administrative changes at federal agencies can significantly impact disability programs and access to enforcement mechanisms.
-
Courts shape rights: Judicial interpretations continue to define who is protected and how ADA provisions apply in specific contexts.
Why Disability Law Enforcement Is Intensifying in 2026
Disability law in the U.S. remains a dynamic field at the intersection of civil rights, employment law, and public policy. With high-profile federal enforcement actions and evolving judicial doctrine, both individuals and organizations must stay informed about legal obligations and rights. If you’re navigating disability discrimination or enforcement issues, consulting experienced counsel can make a critical difference in protecting your rights — including resources such as Disability attorneys in Sacramento who specialize in this complex and impactful area of law.
